Education

 

Education and Segregation

 Before 1938    –  Buying on Contract     Covenants  –   Covenant Database   –  East Bakersfield     

    Education    –   Eminent Domain     –     Moving into a Neighborhood   –    Neighborhoods     

 Public Housing   –  Resources    –   Rumford Fair Housing Act     Suburban Expansion   –   Zoning 

According to historian Colin Gordon, “Segregation reinforced inequalities in housing, education, government investment, trust, social capital, job opportunities, environmental hazards, crime, and job opportunities.” Housing Segregation had a deep impact on communities of color. The lack of resources and education quality ran parallel with housing discrimination. When real estate agents used the argument of “private rights” to deny citizens of color, their own rights, investments in the “redlined” neighborhoods often had unequal services and unequal demographics.

Gordon, Colin. Patchwork Apartheid: Private Restriction, Racial Segregation, and Urban Inequality. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2023. https://csu-bakersfield.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01CALS_UBA/1efqqi0/cdi_globaltitleindex_catalog_421066406

 

Carpenter, Charles. “A study of segregation versus non-segregation of Mexican Children.” Masters Thesis, USC, 1935 (p30)

In a report conducted by the State of California in 1930 found that there were 24 out of 47 replies that cities had segregated Mexican Districts. The report states,
“In addition, other boards cited clauses inserted in deeds and sales contracts calculated to confine Orientals, Mexicans, and Negroes, to certain districts.” Bakersfield was already reported with housing segregation.

Mexicans in California; report of Governor C. C. Young’s Mexican Fact Finding Committee, 1930

 

In the 1950s, George Perkins reported in his Master’s thesis, “Survey of Racial Attitudes in Three Communities Kern County California,” that Bakersfield had seen an increase in the Black population. Perkins reported percentages of 5.5 in 1940 and as high as 18.8 in 1948. Mexican residents remained in an average of 14, and as high as 19.9 from 1940 to 1951. Bakersfield of the 1950s remained a majority white city, demographic ranging from 67.1 percent to as high as 83.6 percent in the 10 year period, 1940 to 1951. The Lincoln School was the segregated, Black and Hispanic school.

George Perkins “Survey of Racial Attitudes in Three Communities Kern County California,” Master’s Thesis, University of Montana, 1952.

In 1946, John Randle King found that the Mexican population was treated as an “isolated and transient minority,” reporting that the white population believed that those of Mexican ancestry preferred to live in segregation. King researched bias and racial attitudes from Bakersfield’s white majority and did mention the effects of systemic housing segregation. King states, “One of the most common means by which a majority group can segregate an undesired minority is to restrict its areas of residence. These restrictions may be made by local ordinances, but more common are organized social pressures and restrictive covenants.”

John Randle King, “An inquiry into the status of Mexican Segregation in Metropolitan Bakersfield,” Master’s Thesis, Claremont Graduate School, 1946
George Perkins “Survey of Racial Attitudes in Three Communities Kern County California,” Master’s Thesis, University of Montana, 1952. John Randle King, “An inquiry into the status of Mexican Segregation in Metropolitan Bakersfield,” Master’s Thesis, Claremont Graduate School, 1946

 

1940s Lincoln School is in the Sunset Mayflower district.

Sunset-Mayflower District- Children of the Mayflower-Sunset tract attended the Lincoln School

The Sunset-Mayflower District was home to much of the city’s poor migrant populations who worked in nearby agricultural fields and labor camps. Due to the black population’s wariness of cohabitating with whites within labor camps, many chose to live with family members who had settled prior or settled in areas where the white population was minimal – like the Sunset-Mayflower District.  

While the district’s population was largely impoverished, the racial and ethnic background of the area was rather diverse, housing white, black, Hispanic, and Asian families.  Census data from the 1920s, 30s, and 40s show a significant increase in the black population, specifically residing in the Sunset-Mayflower District and a decrease in white residents in the area. This phenomenon is known as “White Flight,” in which white families choose to leave impoverished areas when black and brown families began moving into their communities. Those who migrated out of the Mayflower into newer subdivisions opened up opportunities for housing for blacks to become available. The Sunset Tract and Mayflower Addition were a few of the only tracts in the greater Bakersfield Area that allowed unrestricted buying power to blacks. 

Lincoln School, Sanborn Maps, Library of Congress 1950

 

Section 1. “No portion of said premises shall be sold or conveyed to, or occupied by in whole or in part, or be denied or let any person not of the Colored race.” Elmer Karpe, “Mayflower Block Restrictions,” Kern County Hall of Records, 1944

 

“Early in the decade of the 1940’s, the Elmer F. Karpe Agency was the first realtor to build new homes in the Sunset Mayflower community for sale to non-White buyers… The historic housing movement by the Karpe Agency generated an exodus by white residents of the area.” Parker, Johnie Mae, How Long, Not Long. (Bakersfield, California) 1987

 

 

Dorothea Lange, “Sunset District, East Bakersfield, Kern County, California. High school students from the Negro shacktowns.” National Archives, 1940 https://catalog.archives.gov/id/521669?objectPage=3

 

Mayflower Addition, Kern County Records, 7-6-1911

 

This newspaper ad is an example of racial segregation in Bakersfield housing during the 1950s. It is important to note that the advertisement still used “Colored” in 1956, eight years after Shelley v. Kaemer outlawed the use of racially restrictive covenants. The Press Volume III, No.14, 16 February 1956, 1956-02-16bp. Kern County Newspaper Collection, 2020-002. p11. California State University, Bakersfield, Walter W. Stiern Library-Historical Research Center. http://archives.csub.edu/repositories/3/archival_objects/5157

 

1969- Jesse Alcal, Narrative of the Bakersfield’s School Segregation

In the case of the Bakersfield City School District (BCSD), the State of California and the Office of Civil Rights (Department of Health, Education, and Welfare) agreed and the the federal government followed soon thereafter with a charge that the BCSD was in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and demanded the district take immediate steps to integrate its white, black, and Mexican American students. The Office of Civil Rights focused on three areas where the BCSD was in violation: 1) “inferior educational services to the district’s minority children…that disadvantage, on the basis of race and ethnicity, [their] educational development”; 2) “creation and maintenance of racially identifiable special education classes” where minority students tended to be over-represented; and 3) maintenance of some schools as racially identifiable by means of zone changes, grade manipulations, and school site selection.” A supplement to the trial brief filed in the case, People of the State of California v Bakersfield City School District, noted that the city’s “schools are racially imbalanced, separate, and isolated” and “that demands have been made to eliminate and alleviate racial imbalance, separation, and isolation” but the “respondent [school board] has failed to exert that effort.”

Jesse Alcala Digital Collection, 2020-01-23. California State University, Bakersfield, Walter W. Stiern Library-Historical Research Center. https://archives.csub.edu/repositories/3/resources/28 Accessed March 04, 2024.

 

 

Jesse Alcala Digital Collection, 2020-01-23. California State University, Bakersfield, Walter W. Stiern Library-Historical Research Center. https://archives.csub.edu/repositories/3/resources/28 Accessed March 04, 2024.

Jesse Alcala, Oral History with Oliver Rosales. Jesse Alcala Digital Collection, 2020-01-23. California State University, Bakersfield, Walter W. Stiern Library-Historical Research Center. https://archives.csub.edu/repositories/3/archival_objects/8956 Accessed March 04, 2024.

1984- Desegregation, 30 years after Brown v. Board of Education

In 1975, the U.S. government said BCSD was purposely busing students to keep white and black schools separate, a violation of the Civil Rights Act. The ensuing legal battle lasted nearly a decade until in 1984, the U.S. Department of Justice stepped in and sued the district for having “racially imbalanced schools” and to reduce segregation.

 

The desegregation order was lifted in 2011.

Historic desegregation order against BCSD schools lifted

“A more than 30-year court fight to bring racial equality to Bakersfield City School District campuses is officially over. As a result of the federal case, BCSD schools are more diverse, have bilingual and magnet programs at what now are some of the county’s highest-achieving campuses and educate all students equally, officials said.”

https://www.bakersfield.com/historic-desegregation-order-against-bcsd-schools-lifted/article_e974da39-377c-53fe-b7bc-91abe868f2ed.html

 

Establishing CSU, Bakersfield

On August 22, 1952, an aftershock to an earlier earthquake (July 21) hit Bakersfield. The epicenter was in the eastern periphery of the city. The original earthquake and the previous two aftershocks struck Arvin and Tehachapi. It was 3:41pm on a Friday summer afternoon. As the dust settled, the damage was extensive. While many buildings survived, they faced structural damage.
Shortly after the City of Bakersfield began rebuilding and created a new urban and vibrant downtown. Many suburban areas benefited from urban renewal, however, some areas were excluded. By 1956, new buildings were already visible and the urban landscape was shifting to East Bakersfield and to the southwest of town. The Greater Bakersfield Chamber of Commerce rebranded the city as “America’s Newest City: Bakersfield, Kern County, California.” The program included a large advertising campaign, financing, agriculture and industry, and heavy manufacturing. Magazines advertised, “Homes: Built to take advantage of the climate,” while others announced, “Improved industrial property awaits you in Greater Bakersfield.”
Education was also vastly changed after the 1952 natural disaster. Bakersfield College was slated to move into its new location in 1951, but the 1952 earthquake accelerated the relocation from Kern Union High School downtown to its current location. Most schools in the Bakersfield City School District were rebuilt after sustaining major damage. Out of the ten schools, only one was reported with minor damage.
Bakersfield College
Wright, Metcalf and Parsons, “Bakersfield College,” Clarence Cullimore Collection, Circa 1954
In 1960, the Kern County Superintendent of Schools stated that Bakersfield was the largest isolated metropolitan area in the United States to be without a senior college or university. In 1965, the California State Senate approved a proposal to build a higher education campus in Kern County. “Kern State College” was established, but a location for the college was not selected. The State College was to be the 19th campus in the California State College system and it was also the only campus within a 100-mile radius to offer a four-year degree.
Senate Bill 75 established the planning of the State College in Kern County. The bill cited a 1959 report recommending a 4-year higher learning institution in the County of Kern. Senator Walter Stiern argued to the California State Senate that, “A great number of students would benefit from the addition of a new State College in Kern County since there are no four-year collegiate institutions in this area. College-going students from this area will continue to be isolated until a new campus is opened.” Stiern knew that there was a need for higher education. As an advocate for equal education, the proposed college was also to meet future growth and enrollment rates. In 1963, for every 1,000 students, 535 high school graduates were enrolling in a higher education institution in California. This was close to the state average of 559 for every 1,000. There was an estimated 3,000 projected enrollment for the new State College. The bill established what would later become California State College, Bakersfield and subsequently California State University, Bakersfield. The bill was co-authored by assembly members Williamson and Casey.
Greater Bakersfield Chamber of Commerce, “A study of the need for locating an institution of higher education in Kern County,” Kern County 10-1959
Proposed Sites for California State College, Bakersfield 
Tejon Ranch was willing to donate 400 acres in the southeast area to build the new college. Situated near Arvin, California, “The White Wolf Grade: stretched between Bakersfield and Tehachapi and would have been a prime location because of the breathtaking view of the mountains and the easy access for commuters to Highway 58.” Another location, offered by George W. Nickel, Jr., was south of the Kern River by Highway 178 just east of Lake Ming Park.
The final location selected for the new college site was offered as a gift by Kern County Land Company. The land was donated to the state of California in 1962 with the express purpose of having a state college campus in Bakersfield. The campus was situated on a 370-acre site in southwest Bakersfield on Stockdale Highway, approximately five miles west of central Bakersfield, and far away from areas of poverty.
Kern County Assessor’s Map 1967 CSUB’s future site is at the highest value (Orange) Kern County Court Collection

The Stockdale location was the only site to offer adjacent housing and development support. The maps presented to building the site had listed churches, industrial districts, a high school, and new housing by the Stockdale Development Corporation.  Kern County Assessor’s Map 1967 CSUB’s future site is at the highest value (Orange).

Zone of Influence and Suburban Ideal

Stockdale Development Corporation, “Stockdale Vicinity Map,” California State University, Bakersfield, circa 1967

 

Stockdale County Club served as the “Zone of Influence” for the establishment of California State College, Bakersfield. Along with the establishment plan to establish the college, housing had to support the vision of the then California State College, Bakersfield.

 

Wright, Metcalf and Parsons, “Bakersfield College,” Clarence Cullimore Collection, Circa 1954

On the April 4, 1969, the day of the ground breaking ceremony of California State College, Bakersfield, the Members of the Advisory Board held the reception at Stockdale Country Club, east of the university. The country club is in close proximity, and in recent times, Seven Oaks Country Club was established on the west side of the university.